INFLUENZA. The great trick of vaccines unnecessary monopoly 
VACCINES BLUFF - Influence "swine"? It is called this because "it is the influence of these pigs have a monopoly on the vaccine WHO and governments to induce them to profitable mass vaccination." Here, just as they once would have said "communist trinariciuti" (depicted as monsters with three nostrils colorful political controversy in the years 50), now is led to suspect from the news and political health in recent months even communist who is not, in fact fighting for the free market, freedom of science and transparency in communications to the public ..
The fact is that at the beginning of the first cold of autumn and leaves every year, the campaign of mass vaccination against seasonal influenza. But this year, coincidentally, also known as vaccination against influenza virus H1N1. After the suspect
alarmism of the past months, and took away the ominous note of epidemiologists and pharmacologists, the pivotal question facing all is: are these vaccinations really necessary?
This is not the first time that the scientific questions about flu vaccines. There are numerous studies in this regard. Meanwhile, studies on seasonal answer "no". Science has proven that the preventive efficacy of inactivated vaccines is nearly zero.
"The efficacy of inactivated vaccines is Almost zero", she wrote several studies on scientific evidence of influenza vaccines for pediatric well-known researcher T. Jefferson.
So what? We inoculate the people for "health grounds", without any "scientific evidence" of substantial reduction in risk. Take for example the vaccination of children of school age.
"There is a gap between the stated aims of public health for the vaccination of healthy children against influenza and evidence of the ability of inactivated vaccines to achieve these objectives. These tests are mostly absent. But this absence is hidden from the eye of the casual observer by a series of errors and artifacts, and first and foremost the lack of reports of adverse reactions. "(Jefferson T. The prevention of seasonal influenza. Policy versus evidence. BMJ 2006; 333:912-5; Jefferson T et al., Assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in healthy children: Systematic review. Lancet 2005, 365:773-80; Jefferson T. Influenza. Clinical Evidence 2006).
This is to limited to children. Discourse more complicated but essentially similar in adults.
The effectiveness statistics of influenza vaccines is very low. There are studies that leave stunned. The vaccinated can get sick or not, like everyone else. Maybe that policemen, firemen, doctors and teachers are required to be vaccinated every year? No.
the journal there is no evidence that influenza vaccine reduces cases, complications and deaths. It 's a bit a large placebo effect. Expensive. Also cause nothing against bacterial infections of the respiratory tract, much more serious. In essence, many people fell ill with bronchitis and pneumonia without first going for a flu. That this must be to give a high fever and other symptoms which lead to the bed. Instead I hear from people on the subway cheerfully: "Today I have a bit 'of influence ... "
on No. 71" Le Journal de Michel Dogna "last May talking about flu vaccine as a scam very profitable for the pharmaceutical industry. The article quotes the International Congress called "Projet Cochrane" which was held in Rome in early 2006 to take stock of 37 years of vaccination against influenza. The project, the result of 25 different studies, considered 60,000 adults. The conclusion was that vaccination reduced in healthy people, only 6%, the possibility of contracting influenza and had no effect in the elderly. To confirm this, Dr. Anthony Morris, a virologist and expert responsible for monitoring the vaccines of the same FDA, said: "There is no evidence that the flu vaccine is useful. Its manufacturers are well aware that serves no purpose, but they continue to sell it. " Another study conducted in Ontario (Canada) vaccinatoria free after a campaign carried out in 2000 to 12 million people, has reached the same conclusions.
The Eighth National Post, May 2, 2006, regarding a study done on cases of influenza in Canada between 1990 and 2005, about the vaccinees reported: "The flu vaccine has not reduced the number of cases, but this campaign has cost more than 200 million di dollari ai contribuenti”. E in Giappone (dove nel 1976 fu resa obbligatoria la vaccinazione in massa contro l’influenza per i bambini delle scuole) prima della vaccinazione si ammalava una persona ogni 100 mila abitanti, dopo la vaccinazione se ne ammalarono 60 ogni 100 mila abitanti. Tra i possibili effetti secondari del vaccino collegati da alcuni studi, oltre all’influenza stessa, alcune riviste di medicina famose, come il British Medical Journal, citano lo sviluppo di pericarditi acute, problemi cardiaci, encefaliti, mielopatie, occlusione della vena centrale della retina, paraplegie ecc. Infine, le ricerche non confermate del Dr. Hungh Fudenberg, immunologo statunitense, provano che esiste un legame tra le vaccinazioni regolari influenza and an increase of Alzheimer's disease.
Not to mention the well-calculated alarmism about swine flu. In order to convinecere governments, medical and population to immunization.
Influence "swine"? I really need to correct the dictionaries. Even for us, as for the mayor Peppone, opponent of Don Camillo "is that the swine flu vaccine of monopolists - out of every rule of the free market, we add - have on WHO and governments to induce them to vaccinations mass. "
Other than the new "English", all fake. He made it clear in his press conference the famous pharmacologist Silvio Garattini. Infection of the century? Not at all: an ordinary seasonal flu is far more dead. According to the observation center specializing Institute of Health (CNESPS), "in Italy, every year there are an average of 8000 deaths (Epicentre). What more could be done
swine flu? So far, all over the world, has killed just 200 people to stay loose?
So the flu shots are a scam, at best an illusion. Yet you continue to do. Indeed, increased with orders from above.
But, in short, what is happening? Possible that in 2009 even newspapers, tv, general practitioners, in short, the much acclaimed and careful and critical public opinion, so stupidly fall into a deception worthy of the most inquietanti previsioni di Orwell? E’ possibile, altro che. Anzi, sta già accadendo.
Quello che non sempre riesce ai dittatori, sta riuscendo ai sanitari delle Organizzazioni internazionali e degli Stati, alle lobbies farmaceutiche? Pare di sì. Molti elementi diversi si incrociano e si sommano. Un grande, preordinato, effetto placebo per addormentare le coscienze. Il panico in cui cadono i politici mediocri al sopraggiungere di un’epidemia virale. L’ansia nevrotica di rassicurare, di tranquillizzare la temuta Opinione Pubblica, come se si temessero chissà quali rivoluzioni dell’ordine pubblico. Tipica sindrome folle della società di massa.
Ma è davvero paura? Fatto sta che dietro ci sono le pressioni major pharmaceutical monopolies of the vaccine, which can make any money with the assurance that States at the invitation of the World Health Organisation (WHO-OMS) will buy without a murmur the miraculous panacea that will reassure rulers, politicians and local populations. Directors of health policy to give the drug lobbies. The doctors forced by the State Health Services to administer a vaccine that scientists consider useless. Billions stolen from the pockets of citizens and poured into those of the shareholders of the pharmaceutical industry. Who knows, maybe even millions in bribes in dollars, sterling and euro.
It 's time to stop with the misinformation continues with the sham dei dati. Vogliamo un mercato davvero libero, trasparente e senza influenze oblique dei monopoli. Signori Ministri UE-Usa, la vogliamo dare una guardatina anche tra i produttori di farmaci e petrolio?
Naturalmente i comunisti d'un tempo, e anche quelli recenti, erano e sono incoerenti quando, per non dire di essere contro il capitalismo in sé, protestano "contro i monopoli". Proprio il comunismo anzi il massimo monopolio di Stato. E infatti, la lotta ai monopoli è una tipica battaglia liberale. A vedere certe cose, oggi, non in Uganda ma in Europa e perfino in America del Nord, Einaudi, Ernesto Rossi e Adam Smith si rivoltano nella tomba, ma i tanti finti liberali (in realtà conservatori) non muovono un dito per la vera libertà and market competition. The point. The West is ruled by the Conservatives, not Liberals. Better not talk, then east and south of the World: there are continuing to control the reactionaries. It is a mistake, so who would take the right anti-monopoly campaign to fight anti-capitalist.
"Oh, a strange thing happens to me, I'm becoming a communist. And 'serious, doctor?" Calm down, calm down, she's just a bit' agitated. Do not worry, fortunately now there is a vaccine for this! "
. VACCINES ALIVE - But for the great Bressanini (a myth to me) it seems that the flu vaccines, which, however, admits he does not know effectiveness, will be helpful. Be', diciamo che per difendere le vaccinazioni ricorre a tutti i mezzi, dilungandosi su poliomielite, Salk. Sabin, Pasteur, difterite ecc, con tanto di foto d'epoca e grafici. Molto interessante l'excursus, un vero piccolo saggio storico. Ma il problema era solo questa influenza suina e gli effetti statistici del vaccino influenzale stagionale sui bambini. Solo questo. E qui, ripeto, l'efficacia è bassa o nulla. Ma il
blog di Bressanini è bellissimo: continua ad essere un mio mito. Leggetelo.
. JAZZ . Il pianista francese di origine italiana Michel Petrucciani in Brazilian Like . the trio were part of Anthony Jackson on bass and Steve Gadd on drums. Stuttgart, February 8, 1998.
