Henceforth, when a parishioner in the confessional is raped, a hotel thief s'introdurrà in the chamber to steal a customer or two fake buyer will pass the drug store using trouser pockets to try, it's up to pastors, directors and managers of the sale of property go to jail instead of the guilty. And the same will happen in a myriad of owners of private premises but are open to the public - often real uncontrollable crowds - such as athletic trainers in gyms, rectors and deans of universities, directors of the conservatory, owners of cinemas and theaters, theater managers, and so on, be condemned for the actions of others. Remember "Grand Hotel: people going, people coming? Good thing is dead: the great director Hitchcock would not passata liscia con quelle otto paroline che gli scappano di bocca all’inizio del film. Oggi, sagacemente analizzate dai solerti magistrati italiani, doctores utriusque iuris , delineerebbero una ipotesi di reato. Altro che scusa del via-vai: tutto deve sapere un direttore d’albergo e a maggior ragione un regista che lo ospita. Eh, cari miei, le pandette di Giustiniano servono, eccome, altro che internet e Google. E come l’antico diritto di proprietà degli antichi, così il potere pressoché divino del giudice all’italiana si estende all’infinito, dal centro della Terra fino al cielo. Un faro immenso di luce (per noi veramente è un cono d’ombra) che rappresenta bene tutta la megalomania and the dramatic lack of common sense of judges and even the Italian law.
So, another black page was added to the great book of shame of formalism that generates only giouridico unjust justice. The search engine Google has been sentenced - he knows what the news reported by the press - because an idiot has posted a video where you see a disabled harassed by some bullies. And a search engine, what else could he do if the existing record?
the distinguished judges, computer experts, not sure we want to say how Google could have prevented it? We want censorship, control, as it wants the government in China? Do not they know that this wonderful collective work, this man in the mirror for better or worse, this hymn to freedom that is the internet does not tolerate censorship, unless you want to destroy? O
underneath regret Fascism, Communism, where "my lady, not some crap you saw? Of course, fascism almost managed to censor the crime in the old agrarian society, but apparently the Chinese Communism, already immersed in the technology of today can not. It would tighten the belt, close sites prevent freedom of Google. But dictatorships today are not as powerful as yesterday. Forgiveness in front of the computer technology. Today no The CPSU Central Committee could decide nonsense all over the world would know it, criticize it and laugh, thanks precisely to the internet, to Google. In this sense, Google and other search engines, and the entire internet, are doing for the freedom of man more than a thousand armies of liberation.
Few remember that freedom means having to endure some discomfort in all things considered marginal fields of social life, and that otherwise there is only the dictatorship, but it is a nuisance even greater because it affects all aspects of life. There is no third way. And even the antics of some thugs, the Facebook group that urges Berlusconi to kill, the Islamic site that incites a colpire Israele, i siti sessuali, le truffe, certi blog di studenti che si divertono a diffamare, sono piccoli aspetti, dopotutto, di una macchina stupenda, geniale e miracolosa del sapere e della comunicazione che ha moltiplicato le nostre libertà e non ha l’eguale nella storia dell’uomo. Oppure vogliamo vietare le automobili, perché alcuni sconsiderati guidano ubriachi e investono i passanti? O i telefoni portatili perché sono usati dai corrieri della droga, dai politici corrotti e dalle ragazzine fastidiose?
Sono patologie inevitabili, connesse ai grandi numero della moderna società di massa. Anzi, conoscendo la vastità di internet c’è da meravigliarsi che reati e problemi siano tutto sommato così few. And yes, go and hit hard, but identifying the true leaders, not managers of the passive medium. Enough with the injustice of "strict liability", back to the foundations of the Law: individual responsibility. Otherwise we will see unpredictable consequences and even humorous.
Only in the Italian Catholic Inquisition and witch hunts, and in Communist China, could be hit a search engine. What if you think about it, condemn it as a phone book, book, car, television antenna, a tree, a stone. Something reminiscent of the primordial damn pagan animism, or even a Christian (that is, if you "bless" or "consecrate" objects, homes and pets, it means that were "unclean," guilty before God). The difference is that Google is not a demon at the mercy 'of an exorcist priest with holy water and sprinkler, but it is the main engine of the "Library of Alexandria" multiplied billions of times, the Internet, and Google is clear, we condemn not only the new "evil" technologies, new freedom, but also perhaps the hated America. You were right to protest the U.S. ambassador in Italy, now that a article in The New York Times online advances suspect that the Berlusconi government will be checked on the Internet to promote le tv del presidente.
Ma sì, gliela facciamo vedere noi a quei debosciati di "amerikani" demo-pluto-giudaico-massonici. Ma che, davvero pensano di dettar legge anche qui da noi, Patria del Diritto, dove comandano i famosi e superpagati togati doctores utriusque juris "tessaro-trico-tomisti", così abili nel dividere ogni capello in quattro che i processi durano anche 20 anni? Le bombe intelligenti di Bush ci fanno ridere. Anche noi abbiamo le nostre armi di distruzione di massa, ottuse ma altrettanto efficaci: le pandette di Giustiniano.